Air New Zealand Shocks World by Dropping 2030 Climate Goals: Can We Trust Airlines Anymore?

Published: August 2, 2024

Air New Zealand Shocks World by Dropping 2030 Climate Goals: Can We Trust Airlines Anymore?

Andy
Editor

Air New Zealand’s Abrupt Shift on Climate Goals

Air New Zealand recently announced a significant reversal of its previously set 2030 carbon emissions reduction targets. This decision stems from delays in new aircraft production, the limited availability of alternative fuels, and stringent regulatory challenges. This pivot has sparked a debate on whether the aviation industry can be relied upon to manage its own environmental impact.

The airline had committed to a 28.9% reduction in carbon emissions by 2030 but is now reconsidering these objectives. New Zealand’s national carrier emphasized that global supply chain issues and the unrealistic scale of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) production are critical obstacles.

As one of New Zealand’s largest companies, Air New Zealand’s retreat from the Science Based Targets initiative marks a major setback. The failure to meet these targets highlights the systemic issues within the aviation industry regarding emission reductions.

“If even Air New Zealand can’t do it, it kind of cements the reality that reducing emissions from aviation is an impossible task under the current technical regime,” says James Higham, a sustainable tourism expert.

Revised Goals and Industry-Wide Implications

Despite dropping the 2030 target, Air New Zealand remains committed to achieving net zero carbon emissions by 2050, in alignment with the Paris Agreement. CEO Greg Foran stated that new near-term goals would better reflect the challenges related to aircraft and alternative fuel availability.

Foran pointed out that the production of more efficient planes is lagging due to supply chain disruptions, and the high cost and limited availability of alternative fuels pose additional challenges. These factors are largely beyond the airline’s control.

The aviation industry’s struggle is not unique to Air New Zealand. Several other airlines, including United Airlines and Lufthansa, have also removed their near-term emissions commitments from the SBTi database.

  • Delays in aircraft production
  • High costs and limited availability of SAF
  • Stringent regulatory challenges

These issues underscore the need for more robust regulatory frameworks to ensure that aviation emissions are adequately addressed.

Global Production and Regulatory Challenges

Analysts have long warned that the volume of sustainable fuel being produced is insufficient to meet global demand. There’s a lack of incentives for more efficient flights, and improvements are primarily coming from newer aircraft models rather than alternative fuels.

Air New Zealand’s chair, Dame Therese Walsh, emphasized the need for renewed advocacy for global and domestic regulatory policies. These policies are essential to help the aviation sector mitigate climate change risks effectively.

Australia’s Minister for Climate Change and Energy, Chris Bowen, highlighted the challenge, stating, “What it does do is underline the needs for governments to be involved.” Strong government intervention is crucial to meet these ambitious climate targets.

Campaign group Stay Grounded suggests that stringent government regulations, such as a frequent flyer levy and taxes on aviation fuels, are necessary to deter excessive flying and airport expansion. Without these measures, achieving meaningful emissions reductions will remain a challenge.

Flying Less as a Potential Solution

Tourism is New Zealand’s second-largest export earner, significantly driven by the country’s pristine image. Air New Zealand’s marketing often aligns with environmental stewardship, yet the airline struggles to meet its sustainability goals.

Higham, the tourism professor, asserts that the only viable way to reduce aviation emissions substantially is to fly less. The current reliance on sustainable aviation fuels and carbon offsetting programs has proven insufficient.

“Air New Zealand has tried everything really, sustainable aviation fuels and carbon offsetting programs, and it all sounds good but nothing’s changing,” he said.

Hannah Lawrence from Stay Grounded stresses the need for strong government regulation to reduce flights. The industry’s dependence on insufficient solutions like SAF and aircraft efficiency only delays real action and further misses climate targets.

Comments

  • nathanhorizon

    Is it time to start looking at other modes of transportation more seriously?

  • ClaireShadow

    How can we as consumers demand better from airlines?

  • Rose_Enchant

    Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We need to hold them accountable!

  • LOL, airlines and climate goals are like oil and water, huh?

  • MistyCitadel

    What alternatives do we have if even SAF and new aircraft aren’t enough?

  • Can government intervention really solve this issue? Seems like a tall order.

  • Well, there goes my faith in corporate climate promises…

  • JosiahZen

    Is this just an excuse for the airlines to avoid spending on greener technologies?

  • What a bummer! 😞 How are we supposed to trust these companies anymore?

  • Wow, this is shocking! How can they backtrack on such an important commitment?

Leave your comment

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This